Phil Loveder presents the NCVER sponsored best paper by a new researcher award
2. Ray Barker Award for Distinguished Service to VET Research
3. AVETRA Paper of the Year / New Researcher Paper of the Year
4. Journal Article of the Year Award
5. Ambassador Awards
6. The TAFE Directors Australia and AVETRA Innovation Scholarship
In general all the Awards will follow the same criteria:
- they will have a common closing date of 20 February in the year of presentation
- a member of AVETRA Executive will chair the judging panel with two other Executive members or outside members with appropriate background and experience, except for AVETRA Paper of the Year which will be judged by a panel of that year’s conference committee
- all Award winners must be current financial members of AVETRA. In the case of journal articles, the nominating author must be a current financial member
- judges may not enter the competition and may not work in the same institution as any of the candidates, may not be involved in the relevant research project or in other current research collaborations with candidates, or have other conflicts of interest (eg. relative or PhD supervisor)
The Berwyn Clayton Award for Distinguished Service to AVETRA has been instituted as a way of recognising the exemplary and distinguished service of nominated AVETRA members who have through their endeavours worked towards improving AVETRA’s status as Australia’s peak association for VET researchers.
This on-going award is funded by AVETRA and is offered on a bi-annual basis. Applications are sought in February for award in odd years. The award will be presented at the AVETRA Conference. Eligibility: All nominees must be current AVETRA members.
2006 Karen Whittingham (TAFE NSW)
2008 Peter Kell (University of Wollongong)
2010 Kevin Heys (TAFE NSW)
2012 Erica Smith
2013 Hugh Guthrie
Criteria for award for the Berwyn Clayton Award for Distinguished Service to AVETRA can be found in the Nomination Form. AVETRA reserves the right not to make an award if none of the applications received meets the criteria for award. Download the Nomination Form here
2. Ray Barker Award for Distinguished Service to VET Research
The Ray Barker Award for Distinguished Service to VET Research has been instituted as a way of recognising the distinguished long-term and exemplary contributions to VET research of a nominated member of AVETRA. The Award recognises significant contributions to VET research and scholarship and the promotion of VET research.
This on-going award is funded by AVETRA and is offered on a bi-annual basis. Applications are sought in February for award in even years. The award will be presented at the AVETRA Conference. Eligibility: All nominees must be current AVETRA members.
Dr Ray Barker was a foundation member of AVETRA with a long background in training and development. He worked in the film industry in the 1930s in Sydney and joined the Royal Australian Navy at the outbreak of the second world war. Ray Barker served on the HMAS Perth and was aboard when it was sunk in the Sunda Straits in 1942 and he became a prisoner of war. After the war Ray studied psychology at Sydney University and overseas and was involved in pioneering workplace and workforce research. Ray returned temporarily to work in the film industry but left to work in oil and gas industry. Working for BP he was involved in the commissioning and management of petrochemical works in Australia in the 1960s, specialising in training and workforce programs. Barker left the corporate sector to work in consulting and worked with a range of public and private clients on training and workforce issues in the Asia Pacific region. Dr Ray Barker completed his PhD at Newcastle University and researched apprenticeships and private training using a historical context.
2006 Roger Harris (University of South Australia)
2008 No awardee
2010 No awardee
2012 Stephen Billett
Criteria for award for the Ray Barker Award for Distinguished Service to VET Research can be found in the Nomination Form. AVETRA reserves the right not to make an award if none of the applications received meets the criteria for award. Download the Nomination Form here
3. AVETRA Conference Paper of the Year and New Researcher Paper of the Year
Refereed conference papers will automatically be entered into the shortlisting for the AVETRA Paper of the Year. This on-going award is funded by AVETRA and is offered annually. The award will be presented at the AVETRA Conference. Eligibility: the nominating author must be a current financial member of AVETRA. AVETRA reserves the right not to make an award if none of the applications received meets the criteria for award. Download the criteria for award for the AVETRA Conference Paper of the Year – Click Here
Previous Awardees AVETRA Conference Paper of the Year
Karen Plane, CREEW, University of South Australia
“Wine and cheese or chalk and cheese?” Discovering the ‘attitudinal ecology’ between VET and small business for capacity building in regional South Australia.
Bagshaw (2000) writes that emotional intelligence is embedded in life and work, an asset with strong commercial advantage for the organisation’s stock of emotional capital. ‘Emotional capital” is not well defined in the Vocational Education and Training (VET) discourse despite debate about capabilities based platforms to meet the social, environmental, economic and cultural needs of changing regional Australia. This qualitative research is exploring a social partnerships construct of learning ecologies in VET for connecting learning regions and the enablers and barriers to learning partnerships with small business. Small business, it has been argued, is opting out of responsibility for formal training and the last bastion of market failure for VET. This paper discusses what constructs this ‘attitudinal ecology’ between VET and small businesses. It questions how similar visions and common values about lifelong learning can be promulgated between small business and community stakeholders in a market economy of VET. It finds there are more similarities than differences though in the effect of regional economic policy on practitioners and small business, and suggests enculturing resilience and healthy resources of emotional capital in learning partnerships is not only a concern for small business, but warrants further investigation within VET too.
Laurie Grace, Deakin University
Training Packages and the AQTF: freedom to move or components of a compliance-driven straitjacket?
This paper reports on a PhD research project being undertaken through the Faculty of Education, Deakin University. Training Packages and the Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF) form part of the ruling relations of VET, but how do they operate in practice? Do they provide frameworks within which training professionals are free to use judgement and respond in innovative ways to local learning and assessment contexts? Do they impose rigid ‘guidelines’ within which the decision-making authority of practitioners over appropriate practices is displaced by that of auditors, constraining creativity and creating pressures towards conformity? Or does their impact vary, depending on how they are interpreted and who is doing the interpreting?
Roger Harris and Linda Rainey, CREEW, University of South Australia
‘Crazy Paving?’ Learning Pathways between and within VET and higher education
Promotion by governments and institutions of pathways and seamlessness over the past decade may be perceived as both positive and problematic. Seamlessness can provide considerable choice for young people and yet at the same time can readily lead to uncertainty and indecision. A number of studies have drawn attention to the phenomenon of indirect transfer where movement of tertiary students is not linear but instead involves several moves within and between institutions and sectors. This paper examines what some of these pathways look like, explores patterns in such movement and proposes a typology of learning pathways. The research involved indepth interviews held with 49 students in South Australia who had experienced both VET and higher education. Such research can help us to understand more fully the experiences in, reasons for and consequences of moving within and between various pathways. It might also help policymakers and institutional planners with insights into how best to position relationships between sectors and to implement policies and services that help learners navigate through education systems.
Ian Falk and John Guenther, Charles Darwin University
Generalising from Qualitative Research: Case studies from VET in Contexts
One of the reasons that research is conducted is to build the evidence base to inform strategic or policy directions. In this context, the value of qualitative research is often questioned because ‘you cannot make generalisations from results when the sample is not statistically representative of the whole population in question’. However, a scan of the research literature in the field of Vocational Education and Training (VET) reveals a considerable amount of qualitative research which is used for this very purpose even though much of the headline data is in the form of numerical statistics based on sampling regimes. Can findings from qualitative research legitimately be generalised and applied beyond the frame of a particular case or even a set of 100 semi-structured interviews on a particular topic? Are there features within qualitative methods that justify generalisable inferences? The paper stems from the research experience of the authors over the last two decades, during which time we have, as it turns out, been living with a dichotomy. On the one hand, we were taught in our research training that you can’t generalise much from qualitative research, if at all. On the other hand, what has emerged for us is that, first of all, people do generalise from qualitative research; and second, we suggest that we may well have good reason to be able to do so. By ‘good reason’, we mean that the generalised decisions that are made on the basis of the findings of qualitative research are sound, that the findings have indeed been generalised successfully. That is, when the findings have been applied more generally, it has been found that the generalising has proved valid and reliable.
2008 Doug Fraser, Australian Innovation Research Centre, University of Tasmania
Are Australian jobs becoming more skill-intensive? Evidence from the HILDA dataset
Labour market policy rhetoric since the 1980s has promoted the view that jobs in industrialised counties, if they are to survive the pressures of global competition, will need to place ever-increasing demands on the skills of the workforce. This paper describes a study designed to test this proposition on a representative sample of the Australian working population over the period from 2001 to 2005. The data come from HILDA (Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia), a panel survey of some 6,000 households and 18,000 individuals conducted annually since 2001. The dataset includes three indicators representing a common metric across industries, occupations and levels in the workforce hierarchy of the degree to which jobs “stretch” the skill base of those who work in them, together with three variables covering task discretion and worker autonomy, which past research has shown to be highly correlated with skill-intensity. These data make it possible for the first time to duplicate in Australia, albeit in lesser detail, the landmark research on the skills trajectory of the UK economy carried out over the last twenty years for the Economic and Social Research Council. Initial analyses suggest that in the aggregate, Australian jobs were less skill-intensive in 2005 than in 2001, a counter-intuitive trend for which an explanation has still to be found.
Gerri Pancini and Rob McCormack, Victoria University
Learningful work: how can the workplace foster affordances for learning?
Victoria University has recently nominated workplace learning as a universal feature of all its courses. It has also established the Work-based Education Research Centre (WERC) to provide the research and development underpinnings needed to build world class innovation in vocational and work-based education at Victoria University and to contribute more generally to knowledge and policy development in these areas. As a contribution to the work of grounding these developments in current experience, theories and research, this paper will probe current literature around work-based education through the question: How can workplaces be places of learning? That is, how can they be sites that help produce graduates with learning attributes that are attuned and responsive to a flexible world of change, complexity and contingency?
Jo Balatti, James Cook University, Martha Goldman Tropical North Queensland Institute of TAFE, Phil Harrison Tropical North Queensland Institute of TAFE, Bob Elliott Southern Queensland Institute of TAFE, Meredith Jackson Wide Bay Institute of TAFE and Gillian Smith, Southern Queensland Institute of TAFE
A model of professional development delivery for VET teachers by VET teachers: An evaluation
Professional development (PD) can be costly with the outcomes often difficult to measure and sometimes, even intangible. Training and education organisations are seeking new ways of responding to the challenge of developing the expertise of their teachers to teach effectively in times characterised by changing student profiles and changing government and community expectations and demands. This paper reports on an 18 month long action research project involving three Queensland TAFE institutes that trialled a grassroots PD model. Three features characterised the model; the PD was planned, prepared and delivered by teachers for teachers. The project included a formal evaluation of the trials. This paper explains the rationale for this model to PD delivery and reports on the results of its implementation. It discusses how and why the model evolved in different ways in the three sites and it analyses the strengths and weaknesses of such an approach to delivering professional development in TAFE institutes. The paper concludes with some insights that the trial offered on how PD fits or can fit in the organisational life of 21st century TAFE institutes.
Stephen Black, Keiko Yasukawa
University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Beyond deficit approaches to teaching and learning: Literacy and numeracy in VET courses
Literacy and numeracy skills (L&N), now framed nationally as ‘foundation skills’, are high on government and industry agendas, and a new National Foundation Skills Strategy is currently in the making. L&N support provided to students in vocational education and training (VET) courses is anticipated to feature strongly in this new strategy, especially in light of the national focus on increasing post school qualifications. Predominantly, current models of L&N support in VET courses can be seen largely as a ‘deficit’ approach in which individual students are identified, usually through a test or screen at the beginning of their course, as being in deficit of the L&N skills needed to complete their course. Students are often given the opportunity of obtaining assistance through attending additional ‘stand-alone’ L&N classes, a study centre, or a L&N teacher providing assistance in the vocational classroom. This paper considers other models of support, both in the research literature and in Australian case studies, which ‘integrate’ L&N with VET courses. This involves a variety of team teaching arrangements between vocational and L&N teachers in which the aim is to assist the whole student group and not just those identified with L&N ‘problems’. This approach may improve vocational learning by more directly linking L&N practices with vocational practices. It also avoids the negative labeling of students associated with the deficit approach, and may be seen as a more active pedagogy, encouraging change in VET practices. The paper is based largely on semi-structured, taped interviews with a total of fiftythree L&N teachers, vocational teachers and VET managers across most Australian states and territories. These interviews were undertaken by the authors as part of a Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) funded research project on integrated L&N support in VET which is due for completion in mid 2011.
‘Explicating forms of negotiation through personal work and learning practice’
This paper outlines a means of making more explicit some of the often taken for granted meanings and understandings of the concept of ‘negotiation’. Negotiation is
often used in constructivist adult learning theory to describe and explain the nature of learning through the activities of engaging in work and vocational training. Too often, in work and learning research literature, the concept of negotiation remains generic and under specified and so fails to sufficiently account for how workers and learners engage in the interactions and outcomes that constitute their learning practices.
Drawing on ethnographic research undertaken with twelve workers from four different work places, this paper proposes that overcoming some of this lack of explication can be achieved by viewing negotiation as comprising four forms of joint activity that workers are engaged in through the enactment of their work and learning. These forms are realised, discovered, concealed and protracted negotiations. The research focused on workers’ self description and explanation of the particular ways they went about their work and the purposes and outcomes accomplished through their personal practice. With this strong focus on the personal enactment and accounting of work practice, the findings indicate that workers can be viewed as negotiating their participation in work. Further, negotiation can be used to conceptualise personal learning practices as social processes of engagement in joint activity when the four forms of negotiation are used to analyse and categorise workers’ personal practices.
In this way, the value of research to make explicit what is often taken for granted, that is, workers’ active participation in vocational practice, and the voice of workers as those who enact work and learning practices are brought together as the evidence of how research impacts individual workers and learners to understand more fully the nature of their personal work and learning practices. Such understanding can be the basis of improving work and learning performance by developing individuals’ awareness of personal practice and its relational qualities as always negotiated accomplishment.
2013 – Mary Leahy for the conference paper titled:
“Person-centred Qualifications: Vocational Education for the Aged Care and Disability Services Sectors”
This paper is part of a proposal for a symposium of four papers (by Kira Clarke, Serena Yu, Mary Leahy and Nick Fredman) examining links between education and work, to be entitled ‘Vocations, education and work’. The papers are derived from two related projects: a project funded by NCVER entitled ‘Vocations: Post-compulsory education and the labour market’; and a project funded by BVET entitled ‘From competencies to capabilities’.
Drawing on findings from BVET funded research examining the potential for capabilities-based qualifications, this paper analyses the impact of a person-centred approach on qualifications in aged care and disability services. The introduction of person-centred care and, in particular, the National Disability Insurance Scheme, is having a profound impact on jobs in the sector. It is changing practices associated with current positions as well as leading to the creation of new occupations. There is an expectation that vocational education and training (VET) will prepare people for employment or occupational progression. However, existing VET qualifications do not adequately reflect the nature of current jobs in aged care and disability services. These qualifications are even less able to prepare people for work under the new paradigm of person-centred care.
2014 – Susan Webb for the paper ‘Geographical dimensions of imagined futures: post school participation in education and work in peri-urban and regional Australia’. The Abstract follows and the full paper can be found on the AVETRA website.
This paper discusses preliminary findings from a sub-set of empirical data collected for a recent NCVER study that explored the geographic dimensions of social exclusion in four locations in Victoria and South Australia with lower than average post school education participation. Set against the policy context of the Bradley Review (2008) and the drive to increase the post-school participation of young people from low socio-economic status neighbourhoods, this qualitative research study, responding to identified gaps in the literature, sought a nuanced understanding of how young people make decisions about their post-school pathways. Drawing on Appadurai’s (2004) concept ‘horizons of aspiration’ the paper explores the aspirations of two young people formed from, and within, their particular rural ‘neighborhoods’. The paper reveals how their post-school education and work choices, imagined futures and conceptions of a ‘good life’, have topographic and gendered influences that are important considerations for policy makers.
AVETRA Early Career Researcher Award
Refereed conference papers will automatically be entered into the shortlisting for the NCVER Early Career Researcher Award Paper of the Year award as part of the refereeing process. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) sponsors this award to encourage new researchers, that is, within the first five years of their research career, to present at the annual conference and become actively involved in the Association. Funding for this award should not be assumed to be on-going.
Previous Awardees AVETRA Early Career Researcher Award Paper of the Year
Susan Monti and Graeme Stone, Northern Beaches College, TAFE NSW
Students in the Diploma of Alcohol and Other Drug (AOD) Studies at the Northern Beaches College of TAFE, NSW, have been participating in an innovative learning strategy throughout 2002 and 2003, referred to as ‘peer health promotion’, which is a peer driven initiative that extends the traditional ‘peer education’ approach. This paper reports the initiatives that have been undertaken, the experiences gained and the likely outcomes of this study as the project continues into 2004.
Ruth Wallace and Kathie Mair, Charles Darwin University
Turning Points: Exploring the development of learning communities through participatory action research
‘Turning Points’ is a pilot project developed by a Charles Darwin University team and funded by the NT Department of Health and Community Services to respond to a community need for effective and sustainable professional development in the children’s services sector. This paper describes the project, highlights some of the emerging results and discusses insights into its effectiveness and potential as a model for training and professional development in the workplace. The innovative approach to professional development and training of local children’s services staff and organisations, supports participating services to develop ‘communities of practice’ as they engage in participatory action learning cycles that act as a framework for developing positive and self sustaining learning experiences, networks and environments. This paper will discuss issues related to implementing and using this approach.
Ruth Wallace, Social Partnerships in Learning Research Consortium, Charles Darwin University, Cathy Curry, CHARTTES Training Advisory Council, Richard Agar, Kimberley College of TAFE
Working from Our Strengths: Indigenous Enterprise and Training in Action and Research
Developing innovative and successful approaches to training in remote and regional contexts with Indigenous people necessitates effective partnership and the recognition of diverse knowledge systems as they relate to the worlds of work, community engagement and learning. Social partnerships catalyse and enable change in human or social policy (EU Guideline Principles 2004) Social partnerships in learning, then, are the interagency and interdisciplinary relationships that enable effective learning in different disciplines, workplaces and training sites. Social partnerships in learning frameworks are used to; examine diverse knowledge systems, develop capacity building processes and understand the underlying relationships that facilitate connections, engagement and decision making between government, non-government, enterprise, community, stakeholders and individuals (Wallace forthcoming:7). These frameworks operate at and across all levels i.e. involving individuals, organizations and learning systems. Over the past four years a team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous partners in learning research across Northern Australia have identified many of the issues that must be addressed to improve economic and community outcomes of training and investment through enterprise development. As the issues have been widely reported, the project team are now looking to the future directions for enterprise development and training research indicated by the findings of these projects. This paper provides an overview of a series of recent projects developed around enterprise development and training. The issues project teams have explored include the recognition of diverse knowledge systems within the Recognition of Prior Learning process, the role of digital literacies in sharing knowledge and work-based learning. The paper then foreshadows the future directions of this work; addressing a range of issues such as infrastructure, funding, technology and identifying relevant skills sets. Approaches to sustainable enterprise learning and production, professional development and support of successful Indigenous and non-Indigenous teachers are also discussed. Essentially the paper focuses on the ways partnerships and relationships, rather than systems, can effect change in the Vocational Education and Training (VET) system.
Regan Harding, North Coast TAFE NSW
Early days: A personal review of a research into practice initiative
This paper provides participant reflections from one of ten researchers involved in an NCVER sponsored ‘Building Researcher Capacity in the VET Sector’ scheme in 2008. In this scheme, early career VET researchers are supported to undertake work-based research projects in a community of practice to develop their research capacity.
‘Early Days’ intends to do two things: firstly, to provide an interim account of the data collected through surveys and focus group interviews for the research project: ‘The experiences of early vocational education and training programs for young Aboriginal learners: perceptions of practitioners and young people’. Key findings and discussions emerging from the program and the research are presented to inform practitioners in designing, delivering and supporting early VET programs for such learners.
Secondly, it aims to be of general practical assistance to early VET researchers and the experienced VET researchers and mentors supporting them. Including personal reflections on the researcher community of practice, the paper discusses the mentoring received through the AVETRA network and the support received by the participants and organizations included in the research. Each section of this paper will address the research project -‘Experiences of early vocational education and training programs for young Aboriginal learners: perceptions of practitioners and young people’. It will also explore the research process – the research methodologies selected and support received through the ‘NCVER Building Researcher Capacity Community of Practice’.
Tom Short, University of South Australia
Leadership development in a moving context
The success of workplace training initiatives is increasingly connected with how programs of learning are aligned with, and take account of, the organisational context. This is especially true in the area of leadership and management development where Currie (1999) concluded that unless there was congruence between the context of the organisation as perceived by the participants and the development initiative being introduced, the initiative was likely to be unsuccessful. Using selected findings obtained from a two-year research project within the Australian Rail Industry, as part of the CRC for Rail Innovation, this paper draws insight on how leadership and management capability are being developed in an era of changing contexts. In this setting, context is defined by external characteristics of the rapidly changing environment in which rail organisations operate. Drawing information from the literature on leadership, a selection of rail reports, interview data and a content analysis of learning materials taken from rail organisations, this paper evaluates if current management training programs are developing rail leaders with the knowledge and skills to cope with a selection of ever-changing contexts.
AVETRA reserves the right not to make an award if none of the applications received meets the criteria for award. Download the criteria for award for the NCVER Early Career Research Award Paper of the Year here.
David McLean, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
A Victorian tale of two texts: Skills Reform and, the Multi Business Agreement.
During 2008 in Victoria two influential texts were released within weeks of each other; texts that would have a significant impact on how Victorian TAFE institutes would organise both operational and human resources over the next four years. The texts were the new Victorian State Government Vocational Education and Training Policy, known as Skills Reform and the amended Victorian TAFE teacher employment conditions, the Multi Business Agreement (MBA). Skills Reform had many new policy initiatives stated to introduce a greater degree of market choice for the clients of VET providers. The MBA had pay rises with very minor changes to the core employment conditions of TAFE teachers and Senior Educators. While these two texts were created independently of each other, Skills Reform’s impact would need to be closely considered in relation to how a TAFE teacher’s work is organised from the MBA.
This paper argues that the core change agenda of Skills Reform is not to create improved access to training by broadening consumer choice but to directly reduce the cost of training in the public sector through productivity gains. This will be forced by the new activity based funding criteria and a falling financial return to institutes per training hour. This strategy will force TAFE institutes to significantly change the way a teacher’s work is organised, not driven by competition
Southbank Institute of TAFE
‘In the frontline – the voice of VETeran teachers’
As we move into a period where the ramifications of having an ageing population of teachers is beginning to impact on the VET sector, the need for experienced mentors and master practitioners is becoming more apparent (Wheelahan 2011, p.12). This paper gives voice to the Lead Vocational Teachers (LVTs) of TAFE Queensland. A quantitative electronic survey was distributed in June 2011 to the total population of 738 Lead Vocational Teachers. In total 283 LVTs responded (38.3% response rate), and 245 completed the survey (33.2% completion rate). Almost three-quarters (73.8%) had been working in TAFE for more than 15 years. The question of how best to use this group of experienced teachers clearly needs to be addressed as findings indicate that overwhelmingly the majority of participants did not believe that their role is clearly defined. The research examines the role and attitudes of these LVTs in TAFE Queensland within the context of ongoing change. It addresses issues of job satisfaction and commitment. Who indeed will listen to the voices of these veteran teachers in the VET sector?
NCVER Early Career Highly Commended 2012
Advance TAFE, East Gippsland, Victoria
‘A case study exploring the experiences of teachers in developing confidence in their teaching skills and the role that continuing Professional Development has played in the acquisition of this confidence. What has worked for them and why?’
Australia is looking for a model of Vocational Education and Training (VET) teacher development which ensures that there are sufficient people with a sound industry background willing to teach in the VET sector, who can deliver professional teaching to a large variety of students. The problem arises around how we can ensure that VET teachers develop their skills and knowledge further in order to be able to take on more responsibilities and develop their professionalism. In Australia the provision of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) to VET sector teachers has never been addressed in a cohesive manner.
A Case Study approach was used to examine how VET teachers have developed their confidence in their professional teaching skills, how they have felt about this development pathway and whether the available professional development options have been adequate.
This study focussed on teachers in rural areas. This group are particularly disadvantaged in terms of access to any type of higher level teacher training or informal CPD. It considers how these teachers felt about their initial qualification and the reasons for further formal study or continuing to develop their teaching through ongoing professional development.
• VET teachers at a Victorian rural campus of TAFE found Cert IV to be suitable beginning level qualification; however the delivery of that qualification by the TAFE sector was inadequate to fully prepare teachers for the start of their teaching career.
• Delivery of this qualification should be improved and a mentoring system for beginning teachers implemented.
• CPD which is structured to build teacher skills and workforce capability and is recognised as building professionalism may create incentive and guidance for teachers to build their skills and confidence.
• The VET workforce’s capability would be continually enhanced if such a career structure could be provided as it would contribute to supporting the growth of the sector and provide a career structure which recognises the professionalism of Vet teachers. This recognition would in turn encourage recruitment of teachers from industry.
Serena Yu and Tanya Bretherton University of Sydney
“Defining Vocational Streams: Insights from Engineering, Agriculture, Financial Services and Healthcare and Community Services”
This paper is part of a proposal for a symposium of four papers examining links between education and work, to be entitled ‘Vocations, education and work’. The papers are derived from two related projects: a project funded by NCVER entitled ‘Vocations: Post-compulsory education and the labour market’; and a project funded by the NSW Board of Vocational Education and Training entitled ‘From competencies to capabilities’. The linked papers are those by Kira Clarke, Serena Yu, Mary Leahy and Nick Fredman.
This paper considers how educational and labour market progression is linked, and in particular how capability and vocational streams are shaped by different sectors or industries. A vocational stream is a set of occupations linked by common practices and knowledge, and is embedded in a broader skills ecosystem of regional, market and institutional forces. Based on a series of in-depth stakeholder interviews across the case study sectors of agriculture, healthcare/community services, engineering and financial services, we find that potential for the vocational stream framework is based on two preconditions: that there are commonalities in underpinning knowledge and skills across occupations; and that there is threshold level of social capital and trust between the stakeholders to mediate these links between occupations.
4. Journal Article of the Year Award
2013 – Roger Harris and Catherine Ramos for their journal article ‘Building career capital through further study in Australia and Singapore’. The Abstract follows with the link to the full article below:
In modern society, individuals are having to assume increasing responsibility for their own career trajectories. One of the key ways in which individuals can engage in such ‘career self-management’ is by taking up learning opportunities through further study. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to explore, using the conceptual framework of career capital, ways in which samples of adults in Australia and Singapore perceive that they are self-managing and leveraging their careers through continuing education, and the nature of the career capital they are accumulating. It draws on data from two different research projects undertaken in Australia and Singapore. These projects involved individuals who had undertaken studies in two different educational sectors: the academic and the vocational. Australian respondents (n=190) had studied in both the vocational education and training (VET) and the higher education (HE) sectors; Singaporean respondents (n=101) had graduated from both the formal tertiary education (PET) and the Workforce Skills Qualifications (WSQ) sectors. Data were gathered through online surveys and in-depth interviews. Based on the reports from these samples, the study found that the building of career capital was being played out relatively consistently despite educational, political and cultural differences, but that different emphases were placed on the types of career capital, with ‘knowing-how’ the most important.
Harris, R & Ramos, C (2013). ‘Building career capital through further study in Australia and Singapore’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(5), pp. 620-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.753124
2012 – Steven Hodge Deakin University and Roger Harris University of South Australia
Discipline, governmentality and 25 years of competency-based training – Studies in the Education of Adults, Vol. 44, No. 2, Autumn 2012
Among the many critiques of competency-based approaches to education and training (CBT) is a strain which draws on Foucault’s analysis of ‘disciplinary’ power and knowledge. Foucault offered an interpretation of modern institutions, such as prisons, armies and schools, which revealed subtle mechanisms of surveillance and systems of knowledge that shaped the self-understanding and activit of participants. Robinson (1993) and Edwards and Usher (1994) were among the first researchers to call attention to the disciplinary potential of CBT. But Foucault went on to argue that discipline is a component in an overarching systemthe called ‘governmentality’. The analysis of governmentality augments the analysis of discipline by foregrounding the effects of knowledge of populations and modes of power that operate at a distance. In this article, the disciplinary critique of competency-based systems is extended by demonstrating the relevance of Foucault’s analysis of governmentality to a contemporary national system of CBT. The authors use a case of 25 years of CBT in an Australian vocational education institution as a scaffold for the argument. This case is germane because it presents a succession of practices of CBT which allows us to trace and scrutinise a shift from a disciplinary to a governmental framework.
2011 – Erica Smith and Andy Smith, University of Ballarat
Does the availability of vocational qualifications through work assist social inclusion? Education and Training, Vol 53, No. 7, 2011
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the availability of qualifications through work-based traineeships in Australia assists social inclusion.
Design/methodology/approach – Industry case studies, of the finance and cleaning industries, were undertaken as part of a national research project on quality in traineeships. The two industry case studies were analysed to provide data on social inclusion aspects. A general discussion on the “pros” and “cons” of gaining qualifications through work, from a social inclusion point of view, is included.
Findings – The industry case studies show many advantages of work-based qualifications for people who have had disadvantaged economic and social backgrounds. The study presents a model showing how work-based qualifications help to meet the twin social inclusion goals of employment and education. However in economic hard times, the need to have a job may rule out some people. Also,some doubts about quality in work-based delivery may mean that qualifications gained through work may be of lower value than those gained at least partly through formal study.
Research limitations/implications – The models put forward are tentative, based on the findings in the research study that has been described and the authors’ earlier research. Further research is necessary to establish the social inclusion benefits of this means of gaining qualifications. In particular longitudinal research with disadvantaged people who have gained qualifications through this route is needed to evaluate whether their completion of qualifications through employment has assisted their broader economic and social engagement, and in what ways. In addition, research is needed to compare the quality and utility of qualifications gained through work and those through education providers as a poor-quality qualification may be of limited long-term use to an individual.
Practical implications – Work-based qualifications are shown to be a useful investment of public resources. The research also analyses some shortcomings of this method of gaining qualifications so that they can be addressed by employers and training providers.
Social implications – The research establishes the social inclusion utility of work- based qualifications, providing insights useful for education systems and social welfare organisations.
Originality/value – This is one of very few scholarly studies of the large-scale use of work-based qualifications.
5. AVETRA Ray Barker Ambassadors Awards
2009 Stuart Anderson
2010 Hilary Timma and Kate Dempsey
2012 Sonal Nakar and Rodney Mason
6.The TAFE Directors Australia and AVETRA Innovation Scholarship
2014: Awarded to David McLean from RMIT University. David is the Deputy Head of School \ Industry Group Manager in the School of Vocational Business Education at RMIT.
David’s proposal seeks to investigate innovative funding and training delivery models for new micro-business start-ups in the Health and Community Services Sector with the aim of increasing graduate success in business and developing stronger relationships with industry.